akai
- Joined
- Level1
- Points85
- Posts23
- Solutions1
I wanted you to just copy and paste and find out for yourself. That it is just a measurement error. My colleague above has already explained why -l x is so important in UDP.
Well I’m just with a small one. Bandwidth blessed. But I think with fine tuning of the values -b and -l you will now reach the max. Unless there really is an L1 problem on site. But based on your description this can be ruled out.
Because the traceroute/MTR to easo.ea.com is also OK, i.e. no routing problem is visible. Can this definitely be ruled out?
Also that you didn’t write that everything with the box is slow. But rather just a game in particular. Indicates a problem with the game server itself! Due to the lack of hardware, I can’t say anything precise about it.
Now I would create another trouble ticket with all the new findings from the game provider and see if there is more to come this time. If you write again everything is ok. ask how you can check this yourself?
iperf3 -u -R -c ping.online.net -b 20M
[ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 4] 0.00-1.01 sec 192 KBytes 1.56 Mbits/sec 10,698 ms 252/276 (91%)
[ 4] 1.01-2.01 sec 80.0 KBytes 655 Kbits/sec 5,897 ms 296/306 (97%)
[ 4] 2.01-3.01 sec 80.0 KBytes 655 Kbits/sec 3,433 ms 295/305 (97%)
[ 4] 3.01-4.01 sec 80.0 KBytes 654 Kbits/sec 2,143 ms 295/305 (97%)
[ 4] 4.01-5.01 sec 80.0 KBytes 656 Kbits/sec 1,435 ms 295/305 (97%)
[ 4] 5.01-6.01 sec 80.0 KBytes 655 Kbits/sec 0.986 ms 295/305 (97%)
[ 4] 6.01-7.01 sec 80.0 KBytes 655 Kbits/sec 0.741 ms 295/305 (97%)
[ 4] 7.01-8.01 sec 80.0 KBytes 655 Kbits/sec 0.810 ms 296/306 (97%)
[ 4] 8.01-9.01 sec 80.0 KBytes 655 Kbits/sec 0.855 ms 295/305 (97%)
[ 4] 9.01-10.01 sec 80.0 KBytes 655 Kbits/sec 0.569 ms 295/305 (97%)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 4] 0.00-10.01 sec 23.8 MBytes 20.0 Mbits/sec 0.569 ms 2909/3023 (96%)
[ 4] Sent 3023 datagramsiperf Done.
iperf3 -u -R -c ping.online.net -b 20M -l 1420
[ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 1.31 MBytes 11.0 Mbits/sec 0.848 ms 506/1477 (34%)
[ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 1.24 MBytes 10.4 Mbits/sec 0.795 ms 895/1811 (49%)
[ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 1.24 MBytes 10.4 Mbits/sec 6,828 ms 903/1822 (50%)
[ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 1.25 MBytes 10.4 Mbits/sec 0.730 ms 829/1749 (47%)
[ 4] 4.00-5.00 sec 1.25 MBytes 10.5 Mbits/sec 0.829 ms 789/1709 (46%)
[ 4] 5.00-6.00 sec 1.25 MBytes 10.5 Mbits/sec 0.831 ms 837/1757 (48%)
[ 4] 6.00-7.00 sec 1.25 MBytes 10.4 Mbits/sec 0.764 ms 863/1783 (48%)
[ 4] 7.00-8.00 sec 1.25 MBytes 10.5 Mbits/sec 0.707 ms 878/1798 (49%)
[ 4] 8.00-9.00 sec 1.25 MBytes 10.5 Mbits/sec 0.783 ms 806/1726 (47%)
[ 4] 9.00-10.00 sec 1.25 MBytes 10.4 Mbits/sec 0.772 ms 833/1753 (48%)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 23.8 MBytes 20.0 Mbits/sec 1,481 ms 8259/17606 (47%)
[ 4] Sent 17606 datagramsHost Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
….
14. easo.ea.com 0.0% 310 111.7 111.7 109.9 149.5 2.8- In New firmware
- In New firmware
- In DMZ und IPv6
You get IpPv6 natively.
Is a simple session drop machine.
Max. all sessions out ok. Building from outside is not possible.
Can you test pinging the machine from the outside, e.g. But even with the barn door open, have fun with simple port scanning with 2128 possibilities… Our entire universe has between 266 and 280 atoms. Just as a big indication. - In New firmware
@Pogo1104:
What exactly is installed in the house connection?
Pipe length approx.?
Are there other telephone cables or even wires in the pipe?
Don’t take a U72 like others recommended above. With VDSL always U72M.
External interference is just as bandwidth limiting as length and crosstalk DSL/DSL. Unless you want to save money, then it’s better to do it at home. You won’t gain any db here unless totally oxidized.
- Solutionselected by MingWing
Universal connection kit wireless DUO - HD- Quality - up to 600 Mbit/s: 300Mbit/s net: 1HD stream approx. 10Mbit/s per stream, the rest is free for everything else.:smileywink:
4K TV and SwisscomTV 1.0, the question is upscale or native. The problem here is the HDMI port/version. But I would only worry if there was a 4K channel or at least rental films. The main thing is that the TV supports it.
Hi
U72M 1×4×0.6mm is not a problem, but U72M 1x2x0.5mm is difficult to find , or a G51. If you have a choice, if in doubt, prefer thicker wire like 0.8mm. Because, large diameter = small resistance.:smileyhappy:
What also causes problems is if you ground the aluminum foil on the UP and in the apartment above! In the apartment just roll it up or cut it off. The main thing is to keep the twist as close to the pin as possible.
If installed, please post the new technical information, cable plus the cable length. To see exactly how high the effect is.:smileywink:
http://www.gis.zh.ch/gb4/bluevari/gb.asp
Hegsten
Glattfelden
No, there is. It’s in the middle of nowhere, which means you have to pay for your fiber optic cable yourself.
But you have SC UMTS coverage there. possibly with an external directional antenna also HSPA.