As always there is reason to compare carefully, according to your own needs. For example, I have Vivo XS with Swisscom TV basic 2.0 and if I moved to inOne with Swisscom TV M I would lose:

The whole story
Action
Science & life
Crime district
AB Motors

So significant loss of French-speaking channels in my case while I would pay 9.- more per month!

+ replay and recording but loss of channels. Oh well.

So the carrot that is held up to your nose can sometimes…:smileyvery-happy:

For my part, everything is fine Internet in S Swisscom TV in M Telephony in S and mobile in XS we’ll see, we can change if it doesn’t suit

@Xaviouu

Can you confirm who has the Top Français+ bouquet included with Swisscom TV M?

inOne hard to compare… it’s the Chinese puzzle

It would actually be interesting to know from which subscription you are entitled to Top Français+ 🙂

Response from Swisscom: “Top” packages are not included. You can add them with each TV for 9.-/month.

same for L

@Xaviouu

Thank you for the response, this therefore represents a loss of a certain number of French-speaking channels depending on the offer chosen.

however with “SwisscomTV L” the “Top Français+” bouquet is indicated as included, in my customer area.

Indeed, the Top French+ bouquet is included and activated for me with Swisscom TV L

Just place an order and in the process it is clearly indicated included

The fact remains, if this is the case, that this interface which asks you for your parameters and then indicates the channels should display all the channels included in the subscription (including packs included)

In the end between current basic 2.0 and Swisscom TV M inOne you lose a few channels, no intérêt for the change from my point of view. Too bad sniff

Lots of fun for those who will immediately be able to benefit from the new offers 🙂

The M + 9.- is not more economical than the L?

I took the M and actually I was missing the French top + pack. I changed to the L and everything is included! More advantageous to take the L than the M with 9 francs because the difference in recording times is big!

@Xaviouu You don’t have to add CHF 9.- to the L, everything is included 😉

I fixed the message:smileyvery-happy:

Thank you for this essential question, also asked by a friend.

Being 100% with Swisscom I like to have the latest subscriptions.

So I adapted yesterday first thing (with insistence to be able to switch to Mobile S)

I was all in M ​​before (Infinity, Mobile) Since ultimately the speed makes almost no difference, I’m trying Mobile and Internet in S for a while.

On the other hand, no choice, M in TV because otherwise neither recording nor replay with the S and we find ourselves like on TNT via antenna (DVD burners are rare and expensive mnt). Unfortunately between the old M and the new we lose channels in French and not the least: Number 23, RMC discovery, Nat Geo and Nat Geo Wild and 2-3 others. They are NOT in the French pack included NOR in the L but in the additional pack at 9 frs. I find it inflated on the part of Swisscom to not even put the BASE of the channels in French, i.e. the TNT channels; and on the other hand we are stuck with channels in languages ​​which have nothing to do with the national languages ​​or even English, which should be in OPTIONS.

So it’s really disappointing to lose basic channels. What I would have liked in absolute terms is a few channels (50/100) for example à la carte, with recording and replay but obviously that doesn’t exist…

Yes, it’s a shame indeed. Were you able to switch from M to S for mobile at no cost?

Hello BIscotte. Normally no, but as a former customer, and especially having paid subscriptions for years without discounts and having never used for a laptop (I always buy my Sony bare, the operator overlays are rubbish), it’s a gesture commercial, especially since I was benefiting from NOTHING, he blocked me for a year just because I had 10 francs less because I didn’t have a cell phone (since the start of this 5-6 months ago). It’s a test and I could always increase it again. This way of blocking people is just inconceivable, especially when you benefit from nothing at all.