@Roger G Thank you very much for the useful and very informative background information. Exactly, as you said, it’s an unfortunate situation, but on the other hand we have VDSL, which is better than hanging on an overhead line or an ADSL Anschluss somewhere.

And regarding the property on which the PUS is located, I cannot, with the best will in the world, imagine that the property owner (possibly a farmer) will unilaterally terminate the ‘lucrative’ contract with Swisscom 😉

Unfortunately, the PUS was built about 100 m too high up as the crow flies. If it had been built further towards the lake, it might have been called into question with the revised nature conservation guidelines for Lake Pfäffikersee (stronger moor protection).

I thank you anyway. Patience is in order here, at least we were also “in focus” of the SC.

N.B.: Nice photo that you documented there; You have chosen a nice place for the PUS 😉

Nice WE,

Robby

---

@5018 wrote:

The photo looks like Google Street view.

---

@5018 As already written above, the commissioned network builder ‘Axians’ was on site and carried out a location analysis including photo documentation. In my opinion, that would have to come from there. I assume that the @Roger G also requested the material👀 regarding further planning and the PUS Lifecycle topic, and was allowed to post it publicly here (non-confidentially). 😇

Ok sorry, I was completely convinced of it (because of Axian’s presence) But the arrows aren’t explicit about it 👀… it’s obvious 🙌

Oh dear 🫣., it’s already an ‘embarrassment’

Let’s enjoy.the.summer weekend.

Thanks @5018 @foobar

@Roger G

Back to the actual expansion topic, for the external locations of a pol. Community (which may have several ‘towns’ scattered around a certain perimeter). You mentioned in your post above that renovation projects could happen quickly… Well, when you talk about the ‘devil’, what a coincidence. In my case, I have now received a letter from the building administration in the municipality , and it refers to the renovation of the factory lines in my locality. Do you know anything about it? According to a request to the President of the Construction Administration, all stakeholders are informed in advance of construction projects. I now suspect that SC was not informed or was informed too quickly?! 😞

It would be ideal, after the opportunity was missed a year ago when renovating Schulhausstrasse, not to use the open “street holes” again to insert the empty pipes or fiber optic cables/feeders if necessary! That would be sub-optimal, even annoying, and questionable from an ecological point of view if the roads had to be torn up again at a later date. 😉

Cheerz

@Roger G Do you even receive an answer to the submitted request via Netzbau? 😕 Or is it all “behind the doors”;_) I haven’t gotten any feedback on it since then, it’s a shame whether something is happening or it’s not considered necessary because it’s not in the “scope”…. …. It would be nice to know whether it will be helpful and whether you will then obtain the appropriate “permits” from the municipality. 😉

cheerz

Understood. Then I’ll assume that the information has ‘found its way’ and the network construction stakeholders can take the appropriate steps. Thank you for the quick feedback 👍🫶

@Roger G

Now a new residential building is being planned on the opposite side of the PUS. There are 3 buildings that are being built. What are you doing now? Copper connection? I don’t think the existing glass flasks will be enough for 9 NE’s 😜

\=> bg-2024-0078-projektbeschrift-4102024.pdf

Now I think it’s time to plan for Auslikon, right?

Greetings,

Robby

@Roger G But if you have to pull the glass for 9 NE’s from Hittnauerstrasse PFA CO into the sewer system to the property, then you might as well pull another 500-600 Fs to Auslikon, or is it thinking too simply? Please don’t misunderstand me, I’m talking about the principle that the fiber optic cables have already been laid. It’s not about preparing the telephone exchange with additional ODF and connections in the respective racks for the future NE’s in a later roll-out. This effort is then part of the roll-out…

I think you can build it more efficiently so that you are then ‘construction ready’ for the roll-out. Then you hit two birds with one stone. Obviously I don’t have all the details, however, but that would sound logical to me as a network builder. Maybe too simple / superficially considered E2E. If I make any mistakes in my use case scenario with a new building, I’m happy to learn.

@Roger G Great, thanks for your tips. Explanations on network construction. Notabene Auslikon is a district of the municipality of Pfäffikon ZH (pol. municipality). The municipality of Pfäffikon will be expanded with FTTH up to the border of Hochstrasse and Pfäffikerstrasse next year from March 2025, I believe this will happen at the same time as Hittnau according to the attached screening, the other half towards Auslikon / Wetzikon is unfortunately not in the perimeter. It’s also clear to me why, and it’s already been explained in x posts, something may be planned for 2027, since a lead time of 12-18 months has to be expected.

Anyway, really very interesting for me, especially with regard to an area that has not yet been developed like Auslikon (which is still only built with a copper network across the board, with a few SC fiber optic lines under the main road to the only PUS and for companies to Wetzikon).

By the way, I learned from the CH network strategy (REF: [https://www.bakom.admin.ch/dam/bakom/de/documents/tc/szenarien\_einer\_national fiber optic expansion strategy in Switzerland.pdf.download.pdf/szenarien_einer_national fiber optic expansion strategy in Switzerland.p df]. “Network construction strategy CH”)) Federal study noted this very interesting paragraph:

In this respect, it could be perfect for my town of Auslikon to plan a drop => x DP (Distribution Point(s))🙂. I suppose you could say “thumbs up PI”, per PUS i.e. network segment => one drop.

I have a certain ‘passion’ for this (network building) topic 🙂

LG,

Robby