@Roger G

When analyzing the network plans (Swisscom - cadastral plan) via network information for my community of Pfäffikon, I noticed that we are the only region in our local area of ​​Auslikon without mCAN! I was amazed when other external locations of the community, even a location in Hermatswil far away from the community (also part of the political community), were equipped with mCAN. I can’t believe it, they’re even smaller than my town and get FTTS g.Fast. 😞 Somehow I can’t shake the thought that we’ve been left out here, almost ‘off the radar’. Have we simply been forgotten? 😉

Short update on possible construction plans from the municipality for my town here: looks rather bleak because there are no road renovations planned. Nevertheless, advance information will be communicated to all stakeholders (including communications companies such as Swisscom) if the road should be renovated. However, if you look at the street renovation on Schulhausstrasse last year, you knew about it, but didn’t take the opportunity to use synergies to lay glass pipes in the sewer pipes. That’s unfortunate then.

In this respect, I sensed a certain negative attitude, even though I had seen the network construction colleagues from ‘Axians’ at the DSLAM distributor (thought that it might be a sign of preparation for a possible expansion plan, which would then be discussed with the community) :/

A question spontaneously comes to mind, there are always complaints about insecurities regarding tight space conditions in the sewerage channels and DP. Isn’t an initial pipe analysis carried out by SC in the community before the network expansion project is started?

Cheerio,

Robby

@5018 I wouldn’t exactly say it’s pointless in my opinion, but respect your opinion. I am aware that the projects, among other things (the greatest weighting), are prioritized based on the risk, i.e. financial effort. It is simply special that a far(er) remote town/settlement on a hill above mine (the same community), which is closer to CO, was developed. There was probably a reason for it (including permits? etc). “It is what it is”, we just have to be patient here. Have a nice WE everyone.

Cheerio

No topic, I also think it’s great from you 😇👍 That’s why there are such platforms within the community to exchange topics and perhaps discuss them controversially. But you’re right, there are such “nonsense” local councilors who, IMHO, are not that keen on the dramatics and technology. But unfortunately you hear such a statement often. I don’t really care about modern infrastructure in the municipality (area), although it is part of the GR’s performance goal… that you have UPC or Sunrise via HFC is completely sufficient. Well, what can you say about that? I prefer competition on the infrastructure with dozens of different providers, not just wholesale providers😉. Anyway… life goes on 🙂

@Roger G Thank you very much for the useful and very informative background information. Exactly, as you said, it’s an unfortunate situation, but on the other hand we have VDSL, which is better than hanging on an overhead line or an ADSL Anschluss somewhere.

And regarding the property on which the PUS is located, I cannot, with the best will in the world, imagine that the property owner (possibly a farmer) will unilaterally terminate the ‘lucrative’ contract with Swisscom 😉

Unfortunately, the PUS was built about 100 m too high up as the crow flies. If it had been built further towards the lake, it might have been called into question with the revised nature conservation guidelines for Lake Pfäffikersee (stronger moor protection).

I thank you anyway. Patience is in order here, at least we were also “in focus” of the SC.

N.B.: Nice photo that you documented there; You have chosen a nice place for the PUS 😉

Nice WE,

Robby

---

@5018 wrote:

The photo looks like Google Street view.

---

@5018 As already written above, the commissioned network builder ‘Axians’ was on site and carried out a location analysis including photo documentation. In my opinion, that would have to come from there. I assume that the @Roger G also requested the material👀 regarding further planning and the PUS Lifecycle topic, and was allowed to post it publicly here (non-confidentially). 😇

Ok sorry, I was completely convinced of it (because of Axian’s presence) But the arrows aren’t explicit about it 👀… it’s obvious 🙌

Oh dear 🫣., it’s already an ‘embarrassment’

Let’s enjoy.the.summer weekend.

Thanks @5018 @foobar

@Roger G

Back to the actual expansion topic, for the external locations of a pol. Community (which may have several ‘towns’ scattered around a certain perimeter). You mentioned in your post above that renovation projects could happen quickly… Well, when you talk about the ‘devil’, what a coincidence. In my case, I have now received a letter from the building administration in the municipality , and it refers to the renovation of the factory lines in my locality. Do you know anything about it? According to a request to the President of the Construction Administration, all stakeholders are informed in advance of construction projects. I now suspect that SC was not informed or was informed too quickly?! 😞

It would be ideal, after the opportunity was missed a year ago when renovating Schulhausstrasse, not to use the open “street holes” again to insert the empty pipes or fiber optic cables/feeders if necessary! That would be sub-optimal, even annoying, and questionable from an ecological point of view if the roads had to be torn up again at a later date. 😉

Cheerz

Thank you very much @Roger G for the quick and friendly response with the reference to the contact point.

I have submitted my request and am looking forward to the answer.

N.B: I have attached a letter from the construction administration with the planning data for the construction work/renovation of the service lines 🙂

Cheerio,

Rob

@Roger G Do you even receive an answer to the submitted request via Netzbau? 😕 Or is it all “behind the doors”;_) I haven’t gotten any feedback on it since then, it’s a shame whether something is happening or it’s not considered necessary because it’s not in the “scope”…. …. It would be nice to know whether it will be helpful and whether you will then obtain the appropriate “permits” from the municipality. 😉

cheerz

Understood. Then I’ll assume that the information has ‘found its way’ and the network construction stakeholders can take the appropriate steps. Thank you for the quick feedback 👍🫶

@Roger G

Now a new residential building is being planned on the opposite side of the PUS. There are 3 buildings that are being built. What are you doing now? Copper connection? I don’t think the existing glass flasks will be enough for 9 NE’s 😜

\=> bg-2024-0078-projektbeschrift-4102024.pdf

Now I think it’s time to plan for Auslikon, right?

Greetings,

Robby