Try using the init7 setting for the IPv6 tab, just use native IPv4. They have had native IPv6 for a long time and the settings are like this: [https://www.init7.net/de/support/routerinfos/2020\_fritzbox\_hybrid7\_und\_optimization\_dfe\_nr\_01.pdf](https://www.init7.net/de/support/ routerinfos/2020_fritzbox_hybrid7_und_optimization_dfe_nr_01.pdf)

🌈🐰7ļøāƒ£

Show original language (German)

@Tux0ne wrote:

Try using the init7 setting for the IPv6 tab, just use native IPv4.

🌈🐰7ļøāƒ£


@Tux0ne: Thanks for the tip. Didn’t do anything. šŸ˜• But I can’t set everything on my ā€œoldā€ 7490. VLAN can’t do that. Don’t think that matters, do you?

The error messages in Event Viewer are still:

ā€œDHCPv6 error with error reason 8 (UnspecFail)ā€

and

ā€œInternet connection IPv6 could not be established: No response from DHCPv6 server (SOL)ā€

@MichelB: No news from the insiders? šŸ˜‰

Show original language (German)

@andiroid wrote:


@Tux0ne wrote:

Try using the init7 setting regarding the IPv6 tab, just use native IPv4.

🌈🐰7ļøāƒ£


@Tux0ne: Thanks for the tip. Didn’t do anything. šŸ˜• But I can’t set everything on my ā€œoldā€ 7490. VLAN can’t do that. Don’t think that matters, do you?

The error messages in the event viewer are still:

ā€œDHCPv6 error with error reason 8 (UnspecFail)ā€

and

ā€œInternet connection IPv6 could not be established: No response from DHCPv6 server (SOL)ā€

@MichelB: No news from the insiders? šŸ˜‰


Fritzbox = help yourself

Show original language (German)

@5018 wrote:
Fritzbox = help yourself

Thank you for this extremely valuable contribution! <Irony off> Next time leave it on your keyboard. If I could help myself, I wouldn’t ask for help here.

😶

Show original language (German)

@andiroid In the init7 instructions, just pay attention to the setting on the IPv6 tab! In this case, the others are init7 specific and are not suitable for the Swisscom Anschluss (in this case they use PPPoE over BBCS and therefore VLAN ID 11 for fiber optics…)

Did you choose anything related to Swisscom when selecting your ISP? For example, I can imagine that a parameter has already been set that is now somehow preventing it. AVM should check that. I assume they will do the same if you tell them

I don’t have a Fritzbox or Swisscom Anschluss to test this myself.

Show original language (German)

@Tux0ne wrote:

Those affected are welcome to contact our support: avm.de/service/support

Are you sure you don’t want a referral code too? šŸ˜‰


@Tux0ne: Thanks, I did that without a referral code. šŸ˜‰ I generated the support data for the Büxe for the request. The information in there already suggests that I won’t get a prefix. Everything is somehow logical if the box does not receive a DHCPv6 server…:

0: IPv6: native (none)
0: IPv6: connecting
0: IPv6: no address
0: IPv6: no prefix (0)
0: IPv6: mtu 1500
0: IPv6: error 4/0Ɨ2/8 2022-12-12 21:43:55 UnspecFail (DHCPv6/unknown)
0: IPv4: native
0: IPv4: connected since 2022-12-12 21:43:55 (setup time 0 secs) (connect cnt 3)
0: IPv4: disconnect prevention disabled
0: IPv4: ip ww.xx.yy.zz mask 255.255.252.0 gw ww.xx.yy.zz dhcp mtu 1500
0: IPv4: masqaddr ww.xx.yy.zz
0: IPv4: dns 195.186.4.162 195.186.1.162

Where ww.xx.yy.zz is my WAN IP. Let’s see what the Berliners will answer. Keep you posted.

šŸ™‹ā€ā™‚ļø

Show original language (German)

@andiroid You probably didn’t understand the referral code. Thomas tries to reduce his monthly bill at Init7 by handing out referral codes for switching there. šŸ˜‰ Of course he has to do something more subtle in the Swisscom forum.

Otherwise: [https://avm.de/service/wissenskatalog/dok/FRITZ-Box-7490/573\_IPv6-in-FRITZ-Box-einrichten/](https://avm.de/service/wissensdatendaten/dok /FRITZ-Box-7490/573_IPv6-in-FRITZ-Box-setup/)

However, I fear that the instructions are rather inadequate.

Show original language (German)

@5018 wrote:

@andiroid You probably didn’t understand the referral code.

But I’m afraid that the instructions are rather inadequate.


@5018: Thanks, I actually didn’t understand that. šŸ˜¶ā€šŸŒ«ļø I actually came across the link from several sites and it actually didn’t help. I’m excited to see what AVM does with my support request… 😐

@Tux0ne: The fiber arrived in the technical room last Monday. I will probably set out to convert my local infrastructure to fiber in 2023. And if things are going well, I’ll do the accounting. It may well be that I have to think about the code again. šŸ‘

Show original language (German)

My brother ā€œunfortunatelyā€ also has a 7490 because his provider in Germany distributed the things. This provider has an FTTH network, but still doesn’t support IPv6 (that such a thing still exists), which I didn’t even know. I wanted to see what was listed there under IPv6.

I can imagine that AVM will have to rework this. Actually they had enough time, but Swisscom is understandably not a priority for them šŸ˜‰

Show original language (German)

@andiroid: The same situation occurs for me (Fritz 758x) - ā€œInternet connection IPv6 could not be established: No response from DHCPv6 server (SOL)ā€

For dual stack, the ā€œUse native IPv4 connectionā€ setting under IPv6 connection would be the right one on the FB, but in the end the FB tries everything to achieve a connection.
ā€œRapid Commitā€ is probably the only option where you could do something wrong regarding IPv6 address reference (I tried with and without RC, same result).

I did a packet dump over an IPv6 connection attempt and found the following:
- There are no RAs on the WAN side, so the FB cannot obtain a prefix and sends a ā€œSOLICIT XIDā€ request (DHCPv6)
- the SOLICIT

It looks to me that no IPv6 is active on the Anschluss, i.e. Swisscom has not switched on a dual stack.

Show original language (German)

    Maybe connect a real router. It will then probably get native IPv6. Then you can always go back to a FB. Maybe it will work then.

    Show original language (German)

    ā€œcorrectā€?= Swisscom CPE?

    According to this thread, this was tried earlier, but the dual stack migration may not have been completed at that time.

    Maybe someone ā€œaffectedā€ can try this again, I’m holding back, the ā€œstep backā€ from Swisscom CPE to ā€œthird-party routerā€ is always tedious.

    Show original language (German)

    @5018 wrote:

    Maybe connect a real router. It will then probably get native IPv6. Then you can always go back to a FB. Maybe it will work then.


    I studied your sentences for a long time and at first I thought you were trolling again. And I almost shouted ā€œno router requirementā€. Regression is a bit harsh. My third-party router is not a step backwards. It hits with Mesh, Google address book, regular free feature release, re-use of ā€˜old’ routers as AP… I digress. 🤪 But you suspect that the Swisscom router activated IPv6 on the Anschluss and then the FB finally found a DHCPv6? šŸ¤” I’m hardly a proven expert in IPv6, but I heard it differently here (a classic!) and remembered it differently: IPv6 configures itself. All changes are flushed through the network. Be it a new prefix or an initial DHCPv6. I think that the systems at either Swisscom or AVM need to be dewormed. 🪲

    Other hypotheses are welcome to read here. I’ll stay tuned. šŸ‘€

    Show original language (German)

    @Scheufreveu69 wrote:

    According to this thread, this was tried earlier, but the dual stack migration may not have been completed at this point.

    Maybe someone ā€œaffectedā€ can try this again, I’m holding back, the ā€œstep backā€ from Swisscom CPE to ā€œthird-party routerā€ is always tedious.


    I disposed of my Swisscom router. 😁 I will only do this if I have the glass in the house and no other solution at hand. And no, it’s not a step backwards if I can then disconnect the IB from the power again. I know the drama with IP telephony, router behind router… and it’s just plain scary. I will probably have to evaluate the AVM alternative soon. šŸ˜‰

    Show original language (German)

    @andiroid wrote: I know the drama with IP telephony, router behind router… and it’s just plain scary…


    Then the problem will be the same as with AVM. Too little documented, too little interest, too little experience and therefore it is handled incorrectly šŸ˜‰

    Show original language (German)

    @Scheufreveu69 wrote:

    @andiroid: I have the same situation (Fritz 758x) - ā€œInternet connection IPv6 could not be established: No response from DHCPv6 server (SOL)ā€

    For dual stack, the ā€œUse native IPv4 connectionā€ setting under IPv6 connection would be the correct one on the FB, but in the end the FB tries everything to achieve a connection.
    ā€œRapid Commitā€ is probably the only option where you could do something wrong regarding IPv6 address reference (I tried with and without RC, same result).

    I did a packet dump over an IPv6 connection attempt and found the following:
    - There are no RAs on the WAN side, so the FB cannot obtain a prefix and sends a ā€œSOLICIT XIDā€ request (DHCPv6)
    - the SOLICIT XID request is acknowledged on the WAN side by the VRRP framework with ā€œunspec failureā€, with virtual MAC address 00:00:5E:00:01:01, normally used for IPv4.

    It looks to me that no IPv6 is active on the Anschluss, i.e. Swisscom has not switched on a dual stack.


    We’ll ask around. No IP fan has a RES Anschluss. But there will be someone who can figure it out ā˜ŗļø

    Show original language (German)

    @Tux0ne wrote:


    The same situation occurs for me (Fritz 758x) - ā€œInternet connection IPv6 could not be established: No response from the DHCPv6 server (SOL)ā€

    I did a packet dump over an IPv6 connection attempt and found the following:
    - There are no RAs on the WAN side, so the FB cannot obtain a prefix and sends a ā€œSOLICIT XIDā€ request (DHCPv6)
    - the SOLICIT

    It looks to me that no IPv6 is active on the Anschluss, i.e. Swisscom has not switched on a dual stack.


    Let’s ask around. No IP fan has a RES Anschluss. But there will be someone who can figure it out ā˜ŗļø


    @Tux0ne: Cool Thanks for the additional info. It confirms my half-knowledge with a few interesting facts. I’ll have to try the packet dump thing too, just the right activity for dark winter nights. šŸ˜‰

    @Swisscom: Does anyone know why the 6RD server is switched off and dual stack is not activated? Or asked specifically: What needs to be done to activate dual stack? Can I find the setting in Kundencenter? Or is the assumption correct that you first have to connect an IB to activate the feature? Questions after questions… šŸ˜• It would be nice to hear something relevant from the operator, I’m hardly the only one with a third-party router in the network!? I’ll also do a nice know-how article - as a return / win-win situation. šŸ˜€

    Show original language (German)

    @andiroid

    ā€œIt would be nice to hear something relevant from the operator, I’m hardly the only one with a third-party router in the network!? I’ll also do a nice know-how article - like that in return / win-win situation. ā€

    You can forget about the deal, Swisscom understandably does not provide support for third-party routers.

    Show original language (German)

    @andiroid the only one not, but you belong to dev. a very small minority. And this minority is then spread across several third-party devices.

    You can get [this information](https://www.swisscom.ch/de/privatkunden/hilfe/geraet/internet-router/ Fremdrouter.html) from Swisscom. Apparently some people can relate to it (I can’t).

    Fight your way through the forum, solve the problem, then document it and create a know-how article about it.

    The platform here is also intended for this.

    Show original language (German)