Yes, I know… we’ve already had the topic of prioritization. The providers themselves keep a very low profile on this topic and you won’t really get any information on this topic. But as I said, with a cheap subscription I have to expect certain compromises and cannot expect exactly the same quality. Almost all other providers probably do the same.
The comparison above with the apples… if you read the message correctly, this refers to your statement Wingo vs. Lebara!
I have the Swisscom Mobile “L” which has four MultiDevices and so I can use one of the MultiDevices to equip a mobile router with the same performance as the main device.
Two others are used for the iPad and the Translator.
Depending on your Swisscom Internet subscription etc., you then pay CHF 69 per month with the deductions for the subscription.
Installationen, Netzwerk, Internet, Computertechnik, OS Windows, Apple und Linux.
A Zuger who can afford a holiday home in the mountains and only uses it three weeks a year takes out a cheap subscription and then complains about bandwidth bottlenecks at peak times. I also live in the mountains and save where I can, but obviously for different reasons. I’m sorry, but things like that give me a hard time.
Have you tried turning it off and on again?
@philipp_BREM0_1 wrote:
I don’t think the Wingo-5G subscription is cheap. It is three times more expensive than a Lebara 5G subscription.
Yes, it has a very good price-performance ratio! Nobody here has complained about it yet. You are the first. Thanks to the permanent promo, existing customers can also switch to this subscription. Sorry but what do you expect? Everything unlimited with 5G for 5 francs a month? So please…
But I compared Swisscom with Wingo. I only mentioned Lebara because they are much cheaper and have exactly the same problem. During peak times, bandwidths are suddenly reduced to below 10 Mbps. And then suddenly you can no longer stream films. I can then switch back to the cheaper provider straight away.
I just think it’s a shame that Swisscom and Wingo don’t clearly communicate that mobile bandwidths fluctuate between 200 Mbps and 8 Mbps and are then prioritized during peak times depending on the subscription. And exactly when you need the bandwidth. Doesn’t that have anything to do with income or savings behavior?
Please give it a rest now. This discussion leads nowhere. I don’t feel like writing the reasons here again. Then cancel the Wingo subscription and take a blue Mobile subscription.
By the way, cell phone reception always plays a crucial role. Even if the speed Wingo decreases, a change of position within the house can work wonders, e.g. moving to another room on a different side, placing your cell phone by the window, etc.
There was no official statement about this from either Swisscom or Wingo, and there probably never will be. The assumption has been discussed several times here in the forum (most recently here) that Wingo traffic with lower priority than Swisscom traffic. That may be so, but as long as the prioritization only happens when the network is at full capacity, I don’t see any nefarious motives on the part of Swisscom or lies on the part of Wingo. According to the offer, the highest possible available bandwidth is offered, and somehow I can understand that with a limited offer, the cake is divided “fairly” (from the perspective of the more paying customers).
Personally, I don’t care about the cent per megabit ratio; I have a DSL Anschluss at home for streams. What is more important to me is the best possible coverage, even in very remote areas, and here Swisscom (and therefore also Wingo) is usually ahead of its competitors.
Have you tried turning it off and on again?