Ouch… no advice is of any help here at the moment 😞 You were able to successfully fix the BT and I don’t see any measurable problems, but unfortunately this only resulted in 10mbps more in the DS. In the US I even see a little less speed.
When I look at this setup, only a handful sync on g.Fast (shocking). But then they’re pretty okay. The cause of the problems lies in the poor and very old wiring that was used at the time. I also see some corroded contacts, which significantly degrade the signal. So it’s entirely possible that everyone else’s problems and disruptions also have a negative impact on your line. The location is simply bad 😞
From the looks of it, no one will invest anything to improve the copper connections anymore. It is clear that people are more likely to wait for fiber optics here. But since it is a g.Fast FTTB location with 500+mbps, this will be at least. It will be another 1-2 years before we see glass in the apartments there.
My suggestion would be that you - or even several tenants - get in touch with the administration with the aim of having a technician in the building at least fix the UP, i.e. clean it, possibly insert new terminals, etc. replace cables It’s probably not possible, it will be too expensive for all parties. Unfortunately I don’t see any more options 😞
Good luck
Roger G.
Swisscom (Schweiz) AG, Product Manager Wireline Access
Thanks again to Roger G for the feedback 🙂
I’ve been out and about for a bit and have now found the plan of my development, see below. The mCAN is circled above (the label has probably slipped); I’m down at “4161”. The distance between the points is approximately 76 m; I think I have found all the connection points.
What’s exciting for me now is the question of how to get a specific T+T box opened (== 4161?), which is probably the central distributor in the part of the house (for four parties): This looks like a negative Allen key (external hexagon ?), but the edge around it is extremely narrow? From _the_ I probably have bell wire, in the stretch before that I most likely know where it runs in the parking garage (the switches are all accessible under screwed sheet metal profiles under the ceiling).
Zoom:
@user109 wrote:
Only the route UP (house connection) -> telephone socket router (apartment) is exchanged. Incl. telephone socket (T+T83) on RJ45 Anschluss (purple).
@user109 What exactly does “house connection” mean?
I have the following route: mCAN -> 45m cable -> distributor (parking hall) -> 15m cable -> connector (parking hall) -> 17m cable -> house part distributor (?) -> 11m bell wire -> apartment distributor -> 6m bell wire - > “My can”.
For CHF 195 I’m happy to take mCAN -> “My Can”. 🙂
By the way, the installation as a whole looks very clean from the outside - but is there enough space for good cables up to the house part distributor (!)? There is definitely enough space in the cable pipe from the house part distributor, there is also an access point in the 11m, which would make rewiring easier.
@Roger G - I was able to convince the hotline that the “BBR installation” product was available at a flat rate. It also worked out economically - around 70 minutes of working time, material (at B2C purchasing prices),…
The Swisscom technician actually found that “only” around 150/50 came out on the UP (approx. 25m cable length from my socket). In this respect, even after BBR, I didn’t expect things to get better in terms of bandwidth.
Nevertheless, I hope that I have at least minimized interference from the UP to the apartment; The other bell wires (70m) are mostly behind sheet metal shielding - but still straight bell wire.
If time comes, advice comes, maybe at some point there will be an improved connection from the mCAN to me (to the UP). I have connection point “1”. Ta-da-di-ta-da-stupid. Hmmm.
@daffy2: I’m guessing there’s a troublemaker somewhere who’s completely screwing up the DS, because the US isn’t actually that bad. Sure, it’s also impaired, but not as bad as the DS. There’s probably nothing left but to check all the connections to find the culprit.
But there won’t be much movement towards fiber optics in the near future. The location is already planned because it has glass in the technical room, but because of g.Fast it will probably be a tertiary place on the list. Therefore, we should first get the location to work so that everything runs well. I’m working with the technicians to ensure that we start a comprehensive analysis.
Roger G.
Swisscom (Schweiz) AG, Product Manager Wireline Access
@Roger G wrote:
In the near future, there won’t be much movement towards fiber optics. […] I’m working with the technicians to ensure that we start a comprehensive analysis.
Given the overall situation (FTTB, ComCo, the local administration, assumed Swisscom quota in the development) I also assume that FTT-my-Dose is in fact less of a priority for *my* Dose.
That’s why I started exploring and am optimizing from my socket back to the mCAN: my socket => UP 4161 == check (shielded, twisted, no connectors). I still have three segments (three “nodes”, all accessible in the parking garage, which I also have access to) to work on, both according to the Swisscom plan and also according to on-site scouting: D.
Thank you for embracing technology on your site; I almost suspect that somewhere behind the sheet metal covers in the connections at the nodes there has been a little aging since 1985. Plus: 70m(?) parallel strands and induction on bell wire for quite a few parties in the first 45 meters.
Based on appearances, I would assume that there are enough empty pipes for all parties, and that the existing empty pipes are even quite large (certainly 20-25mm diameter).