Hello IVAN = Hans,
I have the following questions:
Who are the responsible people who are discussing this internally
**I would like to get to know the same person**!
Wiso is a change to the gray / white design
or resetting the TV-Box to Entertainment OS 3.2 not possible,
if it is possible to switch to OS 4.0?
There is no such thing as impossible, you just have to want it**!
ALL THE BEST, SILVERMACHINE
Regarding 2:
Technically, a lot is certainly possible, but I suspect that Swisscom understandably doesn’t want to go to the huge expense of operating and supporting two different OSes in parallel.
Ultimately, all customers would have to bear the resulting additional costs in some form, just because a small percentage of customers don’t like OS4.
And see with the following comparison:
When our in-house newspaper changed the font, some readers complained that it was now harder to read. Here, too, it would be technically possible to distribute the newspaper in two versions, one with the old font and one with the new font. But nobody would think of asking for something like that.
Not complete! I would also add the oh-so-capitalized attributes INTERACTIVE and PERSONALIZED.
It is not at all necessary to operate 2 OS versions in parallel. All that is needed is capable, customer-oriented programmers, Microsoft and even open source programmers also manage to provide various skins that can still be personalized. There are even websites that make this possible.
(For this you simply have to be willing to give something out of your hands and not want to do everything yourself.)
@Freerider Why and how many customers want this?
Hello Silvermachine
You made a text comparison with light/dark. Can you also offer me the same comparison of my picture?
And please: We are here in the customers helping customers forum, opinions can of course be posted, but demands for implementation have little chance, so you have to write to Swisscom directly.
Stay healthy and
LG tinu
You see, Tinu, an absolute prime example of why there has to be a monochrome background behind the text. This doesn’t necessarily have to be white, but black isn’t the end all be all either. Even when HTML1 was still used to display websites, it was an absolute no-go to put images behind the text. Things get really bad when there is hardly any contrast left because you also make the selected point light gray and leave the font white.
Any eye doctor will tell you that this can’t be good for your eyes. And that’s exactly why SC should be contemporary and not just talk about it and make the presentation personalizable. Because this is the only way you can talk about customer friendliness. If you want to damage your eyes, you should, but if you don’t want to, you should be able to prevent it.
You would probably only damage your eyes if you consumed the guide for hours every day.
If you want to do something good for your eyes, you should adjust the screen correctly instead of criticizing the guide.
In many cases, for example, brightness, contrast and color intensity are set much too high.
Hello @r4s6
Thanks for your contribution
In addition to the UHD box, I also have the old HD box and can choose the light/dark mode myself. (EOS 3.2)
So far so good. With the new display on 4.0 it will probably be difficult to offer this option. But I am also of the opinion that you don’t spend a long time on the guide page and therefore your eyes probably won’t suffer any damage.
Personally, I like the dark display, I’ve already chosen this in the HD box,
but my opinion - your opinion, there is room for both.
Stay healthy
LG tinu
That’s exactly where I don’t agree, what kind of further development would that be if the options are becoming fewer and fewer. That would be like a car manufacturer developing a new version of a model and then saying that it is now a contemporary development, but unfortunately we can no longer offer the feature for rolling down the windows, or even manual cranks, there is simply no room for the mechanics in the modern slim doors.
Completely agree, there should be room for both opinions (views).
LG Roger