Internet speed increase announced by Swisscom

  • An official announcement from Swisscom may have gone unnoticed this summer. Swisscom is announcing nothing more than the doubling of upstream and downstream speeds for all users! Christmas before its time.

    [https://www.swisscom.ch/fr/about/medien/press-releases/2018/08/20180817-mm-speedmove.html](https://www.swisscom.ch/fr/about/medien/ press-releases/2018/08/20180817-mm-speedmove.html “Increased internet speed”)

    But will all users be entitled to it according to the Swisscom table or only a privileged few, to be continued. Information welcome and expected

    Show original language (French)
    • HenriIV likes that.
    • Petite mise à jour du sujet, notemment concernant le fait que Swisscom déploie du matériel non compatible avec des technologies que eux mêmes ont déclarer obligatoires pour les équipements chez l’abonné. En l’occurence je fais référence au support du profil VDSL2 35b permettant d’atteindre du 200/100 en mode non G.Fast.

      Ce profil est une exigence de Swisscom concernant les équipements chez l’abonné pour être reconnu comme agréé dans le document: “xDSL, G.fast and fibre CPE WAN requirement library” du 15 juillet 2016; mais dans le même document on voit que les équipement déployés en FTTB sont des micro CAN MS5611S de Huawei ou l’on constate dans les spécifications techniques qu’ils ne supportent que jusqu’au profil 17a (“48 VDSL2 and POTS splitter ports with up to 17a profile”). Par contre les équipements en FTTC ou FTTS eux sont compatibles… A n’y rien comprendre alors que le FTTB offre les lignes les plus courtes c’est sur ce créneau que l’on met du matériel qui bride les débits.

      Etonnant quand même de clamer haut et fort des milliards d’investissements pour le futur, alors que le matériel déployé ne support pas les normes actuelles. C’est du foutage de gueule et surtout démontre que le FTTB est là uniquement pour vérouiller le marché et empêcher à la conccurence d’accéder au FTTH.

    All users? No, of course!

    In my neighborhood of new houses equipped with optical fiber, we remain at 12/1 Mb, because Swisscom does not run the necessary lines to the houses.

    Contacted by the competition who offered me 500/50, I let myself be tempted.

    Goodbye Swisscom.

    Show original language (French)

    Cordialement, Prelude

    @Prelude Hi

    Strange, your 12/1 connection is not possible because it seems to me that you have a Swisscom TV UHD box and an Apple TV?

    PS: A stable connection speed of at least 25 megabits per second is necessary to watch a film or series in 4K, and for the TV box!

    Cordialement

    Show original language (French)

    Hi Doremi!

    I do have a UHD internet box, but…. I don’t have access to UHD channels, unfortunately! I am not entitled to this with my connection. I received this box a year ago when I registered with Swisscom.

    I also have an Apple TV box. I mainly use it for the movies I have on my Nas. But I have access to UHD thanks to it on Netflix when my internet booster wants to hook up a 4G transmitter. I have all my windows to the West and the transmitter is to the East.

    In short, I spend my time rebooting the internet booster, the internet box…. and sometimes I can reach the 20-30 mb that the Checker promises me with the internet booster.

    There are sometimes periods of two or three weeks where it lasts and others, like this month of August, where I only have problems. And no improvements planned in my neighborhood in sight.

    Show original language (French)

    Cordialement, Prelude

    I tested the booster to stick on the window but I was treated to a reduction in internet speed via copper cable so that in the end I always had the same speed, i.e. 50-60. Returned everything and after calling the hotline I returned to the previous situation. I improved WiFi distribution using ORBI terminals.

    Show original language (French)
    21 days later

    Indeed a letter reached me on this subject.

    Living in a small village, I subscribed to the lowest speed 40/8, knowing that I would never exceed 28 MB.

    In the letter he mentioned that the speeds would be increased from 01.10 to 50/50 with 2 months at the same rate and then 5.- per month more.

    After discussion with a hotline agent, my speed will not change because it is far too isolated.

    In the end I had to ask them not to carry out the migration.

    After reflection, I do not find it correct for them to force the basic increase (speed and price) without asking customers’ opinions. If we do not refuse, our bill will increase.

    Example 100,000 customers who receive the letter (who will not have their throughput increased) x 5 × 10 (for the first year) = 5 Million additional profits on the first and 6 Million the following…

    This is more of a theft than an improvement in service.

    Show original language (French)

    Hi @Le1000

    Theft?:blush:

    Because for you, sending a letter to the client telling him that if he wishes, he can not be migrated, is not asking the client’s opinion?

    your thinking may be curious… I thought that not giving someone the choice is not giving them the choice, whereas here, Swisscom leaves the choice to the customer not to be migrated…

    yes I repeat myself in this post, I know…:smile_sweat:

    Show original language (French)

    Hi @Hellite,

    Indeed, the choice is there.

    But I think that a good portion of customers are not necessarily aware of the speeds and their availability.

    Because at first I thought cool, I can finally have a better connection.

    In the end I think that a good number of customers will do nothing and will not see a difference except on their bill from the 3rd month.

    The process should have gone the other way. If you wish you can increase the flow for 5.- more per month.

    Show original language (French)

    In English, Swisscom’s strategy is called “opt out”, yes we give the customer the choice but only not to take the option, by default we consider a tacit agreement.

    Legally and commercially probably acceptable; but not from an ethical and cultural point of view. Personally, I would not accept a change to my contract being imposed on me without my written and validly documented consent.

    With the “opt out” approach, a good 80% of subscription is ensured which will be increased, while with the opposite approach they would certainly only have gotten 20-30%, in fact only customers with lines capable of providing the proposed flow and really wishing to benefit from it.

    So very questionable and above all very revealing of the new strategic and commercial direction of the blue giant.

    Show original language (French)

    @squale there is no promise, it is just noted that this is the maximum flow rate.

    Regarding the price increase, you should have received a letter from Swisscom notifying you of the change and that you had the possibility to refuse this change before October 1st![:grin_smile:](https://community.swisscom.ch /html/@90EF9BABA1FE270ED8C459F9AB6A6446/images/smilies/grinning.png “:grin_smile:”)

    Show original language (French)

    @“x”#1337I hope you have luck if you try to cancel with swisscom to revert to the previous speed.

    @“x”#391299That’s why I think the method used wasn’t the right one 😉

    Show original language (French)