Blog > Cell phone > Almost no one uses these useful cell phone functions: Pretty sloppily written

For me, the blog post “Blog > Cell Phone > Almost no one uses these useful cell phone functions” is an example of how not to do it.

I would like to give it a thumbs down, but that’s not the plan.

These tips for “useful cell phone functions” are so short and so general and sloppily described that you don’t need them. I expect such tips to always present the procedure precisely and step by step.

Just do a little searching on your cell phone, I’m good at that now, I don’t need any tips.

I’m not an all-knowing professor, on the contrary.

Take the Widget Stacks section, for example. I really can’t get out of this. You could make your own blog post out of this. Then you have to show examples and demonstrate the steps one by one.

And certainly not like this: "Android: Google “Discover” or Samsung “Smart Widgets” offer similar functions that can be accessed via the widget menu. The principle is the same: you can combine widgets with each other."

If you don’t want to collect users, then you have to do it exactly like that.

Yes, of course, there is Google, there are books for dummies, and sometimes there are computer games for seniors.

But if you want to address hundreds of blog readers, you might as well do the right thing when explaining. Just throwing out a few Gutzelis isn’t enough for me.

When I was still working as a programmer, we had a word for creating short, incomprehensible and undocumented program code: machocoding. Here we could call the situation macho blogging.

Actually, I just wanted to give a quick thumbs down.