Forget it, anything but canceling and waiting for the customer recovery offer to be raised won’t help. Swisscom knows full well that 95 percent of customers do nothing more than hold their own and continue to pay the excessive prices.
In the current price war with Salt and Co, existing customers are at best the idiots of the service.
Stupid game, but Swisscom apparently wanted it that way. And CH-Seppel lets you do that. Your own fault.
@Mister_Anonym wrote:
….
Quote from Swisscom: “You also keep new customers and were able to benefit from an offer”
What is wrong with this statement?
There’s nothing wrong there. Apart from the fact that I don’t get anything offered after being a customer for about 10 years, I think it’s a shame.
But regular layoffs create jobs, I hope…
Swisscom is already doing it smartly!
I couldn’t find anything online about the new customer offer.
Knowledge is power.
@kaetho wrote:
@Mister_Anonym wrote:
….
Quote from Swisscom: “You also keep new customers and were able to benefit from an offer”
What is wrong with this statement?
the grammar?
@Doc wrote:
@kaetho wrote:
@Mister_Anonym wrote:
….
Quote from Swisscom: “You also keep new customers and were able to benefit from an offer”
What’s wrong with this statement?
the grammar?
Perhaps “were” plus the emphasis on credibility = “true” is also considered a New German verb in the past tense, although the present tense “sihnd” would of course be difficult to use…
Hobby-Nerd ohne wirtschaftliche Abhängigkeiten zur Swisscom
@Doc wrote:
@kaetho wrote:
@Mister_Anonym wrote:
….
Quote from Swisscom: “You also keep new customers and were able to benefit from an offer”
What’s wrong with this statement?
the grammar?
As long as the message/statement is clearly understandable, grammar in a forum doesn’t matter at all to me. The contributions are not an application letter.
